Health hazard: Numerous lip care sticks contaminated with carcinogenic petroleum

Health hazard: Numerous lip care sticks contaminated with carcinogenic petroleum

We are searching data for your request:

Forums and discussions:
Manuals and reference books:
Data from registers:
Wait the end of the search in all databases.
Upon completion, a link will appear to access the found materials.

Health hazard: Carcinogenic petroleum found in lip care sticks
If you are one of those people who regularly use lip care products, you should pay attention to the results of a recent study. The Stiftung Warentest found that many of these care products contain petroleum-based substances. Some of them are suspected of causing cancer.

Carcinogenic substances in lip care
For many people, it goes without saying that they always have a care pencil for their lips on hand. However, research has shown that some of these pens can pose a major health hazard because they contain substances that may be carcinogenic. Mineral oils were found in lip care as part of a study carried out for the North Rhine-Westphalian Ministry of Consumer Protection. The Stiftung Warentest has now tested various lip care products and discovered critical substances in around every second pen.

Regular users swallow four lipsticks a year
According to the product testers, the European Commission's Scientific Committee for Consumer Safety (SCCS) has calculated that regular users swallow around 20 grams of lipstick a year - that's about four lipsticks.

It is all the more important that the products are free of critical substances. Because they easily enter the body through the mouth.

The Stiftung Warentest examined 35 lip care products. In a message, it said: “The testers found critical substances in 18 products, including in well-known brands. The good news: We can recommend 15 lip care products - including almost all natural cosmetic products in the test. ”

According to another report, saturated or aromatic hydrocarbons (Mosh or Moah) or synthetic hydrocarbons (Posh) have been found.

Petroleum-based substances also in branded products
According to the information, lip care products containing petroleum-based raw materials are particularly affected. These include branded products such as those from Labello, Blistex or Bebe. The critical substances can enter the body directly through the mouth.

The aromatic hydrocarbons (Moah) are suspected of being carcinogenic. The health consequences of saturated hydrocarbons (mosh) have not yet been fully clarified. The Stiftung Warentest therefore recommends that you do not use these lip care products.

The European Food Safety Authority EFSA already estimates the amount that consumers ingest via food alone as "potentially unsafe". The intake should therefore be kept as low as possible.

Natural cosmetic products do better
But even without petroleum-based ingredients, lip care products can contain substances of concern.

Critical Posh was found in two products from the pharmacy - the Nutritic Lip lip balm from La Roche-Posay and the Aqualia Thermal lip balm from Vichy. These are synthetic hydrocarbons that are very similar to the Mosh and could also accumulate in the body.

Even in a natural cosmetic product, the lip balm pomegranate from Bee Natural, the foundation found slight traces of mosh - which may have got into the lip balm due to contamination during the manufacturing process.

But the testers at Stiftung Warentest also have good news: 15 of the 35 lip care products tested are recommended. This also includes products from Cien (Lidl), Balea (dm) or Bepanthol.

It can be worthwhile to choose a natural cosmetic product because: "Among the 15 lip care products in which we have not found any critical substances, 6 of the 7 products have a natural cosmetic seal". (ad)

Author and source information

Video: Beginners Makeup Tutorial Ep4: How To Apply Lipstick Properly For Beginners. Lipstick Tutorial (May 2022).


  1. Moncreiffe

    You give yourself the report, in what has been said ...

  2. Lazarus

    Thank you for the information. I did not know this.

  3. Harlowe

    Many thanks for an explanation, now I will not commit such error.

Write a message